Week 5 Jourmal
Assess your own work based on the rubric and feedback from your colleagues. Add this to your online reading journal entry for this week.
- Why was your performance at the level that it was?
What might effective self-assessment look like in your discipline?
In Science, I use three types of self-assessment and each is effective in its own way. First is self assessment within project groups. Students are given a rubric for each project which clearly states the targets for the project along with a scale from below expectations to exceeding expectations so students understand the requirements for exemplary work. This assessment also extends to contributions to the project as students assess themselves and their group members. I can then find disconnects in student's perceived contributions and those noted by others to give specific feedback to students.
Second is self-assessment in regards to revising exit tickets and other classwork. If 50% or more of the class does not understand the content of the exit ticket, I would take class time to break down the questions, address misconceptions, and elicit student thought in regards to the exit ticket. In this case, I don't provide specific feedback to each student and just walk through the problems with the students. Once we've walked through the problems. students can go back to their work and assess whether they've broken down the problem properly or understood the content properly. Because student's were not given grades or feedback, each student would have to evaluate their own work and revise based on their new understandings of the content. Fowler et al. (2019)
Lastly, I use self-assessment for exams. For example, I had a Performance Open Response Quiz that asked students three questions that targeted different skills or levels on content knowledge. Skills included modeling, argumentation, and analyzing data. At the end of the quiz, there was a posted rubric of what each response must include at a high level. The rubric included no content information but informed students that Bohr models must be accurate, labeled, and include a description. This allows students to access what aspects of the rubric they have included and then move towards meeting all expectations based on the guidelines. Students can think about what aspects they are missing and will remember to include these in responses going forward.
- What, if anything, could have been done to strengthen your grade?
Lastly, reflect on the following questions:
- How much do you feel like you learned from assessing OTHERS work?
- How much did you feel you learned from assessing your OWN work?
- How might this peer and self assessment experience be used to improve learning in your classroom context?
- What implications does this assignment have for creating and improving rubrics for learning?
Comments
Post a Comment